Citation: Yun, S., Lee, H., 2023, Analyzing Characteristics of GPS Dual-frequency SPP Techniques by Introducing the L2C Signal, Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing, 12, 157-166.
Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (J Position Navig Timing) 2023 June, Volume 12, Issue 2, pages 157-166. https://doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2023.12.2.157
Received on 08 May 2023, Revised on 26 May 2023, Accepted on 03 June 2023, Published on 30 June 2023.
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Seonghyeon Yun1, Hungkyu Lee2†
1Ocean and Maritime Digital Technology Research Division, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO), Daejeon 34103, Korea
2Department of Civil Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Korea
†Corresponding Author: E-mail, hkyulee@changwon.ac.kr; Tel: +82-55-213-3777 Fax: +82-55-285-9491
Several experiments were carried out to analyze the impact of the modernized Global Positioning System (GPS) L2C signal on pseudorange-based point positioning. Three dual-frequency positioning algorithms, ionosphere-free linear combination, ionospheric error estimation, and simple integration, were used, and the results were compared with those of Standard Point Positioning (SPP). An analysis was conducted to determine the characteristics of each dual-frequency positioning method, the impact of the magnitude of ionospheric error, and receiver grade. Ionosphere-free and ionospheric error estimation methods can provide improved positioning accuracy relative to SPP because they are able to significantly reduce the ionospheric error. However, this result was possible only when the ionospheric error reduction effect was greater than the disadvantage of these dual-frequency positioning algorithms such as the increment of multipath and noise, impact of uncertainty of unknown parameter estimation. The RMSE of the simple integration algorithm was larger than that of SPP, because of the remaining ionospheric error. Even though the receiver grade was different, similar results were observed.
L2C, GPS modernization, dual-frequency, point positioning, accuracy
Cameron, A. 2015, To L2C or Not to L2C? That is the Operational Question [Internet], cited 2023 Mar 29, available from: https://www.gpsworld.com/to-l2c-ornot-to-l2c-that-is-the-operational-question/
Dach, R., Hugentobler, U., Fridez, P., & Meindl, M. 2007, Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0, Manual (Bern: Astronomical Institute, University of Bern)
Flores, A. 2021, NAVSTAR GPS space segment/navigation user interfaces (Rev. M), Technical Document (Interface Control Document), IS-GPS-200
GSA 2019, GNSS Market Report, European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency Technical Report, GSA/Issue 6
Hai, T. T., Dinh, T. N., Falco, C., Linty, N., Cristodaro, C., et al. 2015, Performance assessment of the new L2C CNAV GPS signal, In International Symposium on GNSS 2015, Kyoto, Japan, 16-19 Nov 2015. https://doi.org/10.13140/ RG.2.1.4558.5046
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., & Collins, J. 2001, Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice, 5th rev. ed. (New York: Springer-Verlag/Wien)
Inside GNSS 2006, The L2C Study: Benefits of the New GPS L2C Civil Signal [Internet], cited 2023 Mar 29, available from: https://insidegnss.com/the-l2c-study-benefitsof-the-new-gps-civil-signal/
KMITL (King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang), Software [Internet], cited 2023 Apr 11, available from: http://iono-gnss.kmitl.ac.th/?page_id=3360
Langley, R. B. 2000, GPS, the ionosphere, and the solar maximum, GPS World, 11, 44-49
Leick, A., Rapoport, L., & Tatarnikov, D. 2015, GPS Satellite Surveying, 4th ed. (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
Marques, H. A. S., Monico, J. F. G., & Marques, H. A. 2016, Performance of the L2C civil GPS signal under various ionospheric scintillation effects, GPS Solutions, 20, 139149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0472-2
NAVCEN (Navigation Center), GPS Constellation [Internet], cited 2023 May 01, available from: https://www.navcen. uscg.gov/gps-constellation
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), GPS Modernization [Internet], cited 2023 Apr 29, available from: https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/ modernization/
O’Keefe, K., Wang, D., Petovello, M. G., & Gernot, C. 2009, Benefit of partial L2C availability for correcting ionospheric error for standalone GPS, In Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Savannah, GA, 22-25 Sep 2009, pp.2530-2550.
Salos, D., Macabiau, C., Martineau, A., Bonhoure, B., & Kubrak, D. 2010, Nominal GNSS pseudorange measurement model for vehicular urban application, In IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, Indian Wells, CA, 04-06 May 2010, pp.806815. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2010.5507319
Strang, G. & Borre, K. 1997, Linear Algebra, Geodesy, and GPS (Wellesley: Wellesley-Cambrdige Press)
SWPC (Space Weather Prediction Center), Solar Cycle Progression [Internet], cited 2023 May 24, available from: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solarcycle-progression
Takasu, T. 2013, RTKLIB: An Open Source Program Package for GNSS Positioning, Manual, version 2.4.2
Wang, A., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, B. 2019, Performance evaluation of the CNAV broadcast ephemeris, The Journal of Navigation, 72, 1331-1344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037346331900016X
Wanninger, L. & May, M. 2001, Carrier-phase multipath calibration of GPS reference stations, Navigation, 48, 112124. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2001.tb00233.x
Yun. S. 2023, A study on analyzing impact of the modernized L2C signal on pseudorange-based GPS point positioning, Ph.D. Dissertation, Changwon National University, Korea.
Conceptualization, H.L. and S.Y; methodology, H.L. and S.Y.; software, S.Y.; validation, H.L.; formal analysis, Y.S.; investigation, H.L. and Y.S.; data curation, Y.S.; writingoriginal draft preparation, Y.S.; writing-review and editing, H.L. and Y.S.; visualization, Y.S.; supervision, H.L.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.